无量山乌骨鸡器官指数比较分析

曲靖师范学院学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 26-31.

• 生物学研究·生物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

无量山乌骨鸡器官指数比较分析

李正田¹, 申志超², 唐学锋³, 袁荷梅¹

1.曲靖师范学院生物资源与食品工程学院,云南曲靖 655011;
2.汝阳县农业农村局农业技术推广服务中心,河南洛阳 471200;
3.凤庆县人民医院郭大寨彝族白族乡分院中医科,云南临沧 675900

收稿日期:2023-08-24 出版日期:2023-11-26 发布日期:2023-12-07
作者简介:李正田,曲靖师范学院生物资源与食品工程学院讲师,博士,主要从事畜产品质量与安全研究.
基金资助:
云南省基础研究计划项目“中草药饲料添加剂对大围山微型鸡和科宝肉鸡沙门氏菌感染控制效果及机理研究”(202101AU070147);云南省地方本科高校基础研究联合专项“云南盐津乌骨鸡肌肉脂肪酸合成的遗传基础研究”(202101BA070001-210);云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目“基于多指纹图谱技术的宣威火腿风味品级评价研究”(2023J1037);曲靖市科学技术局·曲靖师范学院科技创新联合专项“基于电子鼻的宣威火腿产地鉴别与品级评定研究”(KJLH2022YB06).

Comparative Analysis of Organ Index of Wuliangshan Silky Fowl

LI Zhengtian¹, SHEN Zhichao², TANG Xuefeng³, YUAN Hemei¹

1. School of Biological Resource and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing Yunnan 655011;
2. Agricultural Technology Extension Service Center, Ruyang County Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Luoyang Henan 471200;
3. Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yi Bai Township Branch of Guodazhai, Fengqing People′s Hospital, Lincang Yunnan 675900, China

Received:2023-08-24 Published:2023-11-26 Online:2023-12-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 内脏器官是消化和吸收各类营养物质的主要区域,是身体的功能性器官,对于家禽的生长发育起着极其重要的作用.通过对40只五月龄无量山乌骨鸡器官指数的比较分析得出:公鸡的活重、肺脏重、心脏重、性腺重、肝脏重均极显著高于母鸡(P<0.01),而肌胃重则显著高于母鸡(P<0.05);公鸡的性腺、肺脏和心脏指数均显著高于母鸡(P<0.05),而肝脏和肌胃指数显著低于母鸡(P<0.05);公鸡的心脏和性腺指数均与活重呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),母鸡的心脏、肾脏、肺脏和腺胃指数均与活重呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),肝脏和腺胃指数与活重呈显著正相关(P<0.05).内脏器官的重量和器官指数在一定程度上反映了动物机体的机能状况,对于理论研究和生产实践有重要的指导意义.

关键词: 无量山乌骨鸡, 器官指数, 比较分析

Abstract: Internal organs are the functional organs of the body that play an important role in digestion and absorption of various nutrients and body growth performance and development of poultry. The organ indexes of 40 Wuliangshan black-bone chickens at the age of five months are compared with the internal organs of hens. The results showed significantly higher live body weight, lungs, heart, gonads and liver weight of cocks than those of hens(P<0.01). Muscle stomach weight is significantly higher than that of hens(P<0.05). The gonads, lungs and heart weight indexes of cocks are significantly higher than those of hens (P<0.05). The liver and gastric indices are significantly lower than those of hens (P<0.05). Both heart and gonads weight indexes are significantly positively correlated with live weight and the weight indexes of heart, kidneys, lungs and glandular stomach are significantly positively correlated with live weight (P<0.01). Moreover, liver and adeno gastric indices are significantly positively correlated with live weight (P<0.05). The weight and organs indexes of internal organs reflect the function of animal body to a certain extent, and have important guiding significance for metabolic activity and production practices.

Key words: Wuliangshan silky fowl, organ index, comparative analysis

中图分类号:

S831.2

李正田, 申志超, 唐学锋, 袁荷梅. 无量山乌骨鸡器官指数比较分析[J]. 曲靖师范学院学报, 2023, 42(6): 26-31.

LI Zhengtian, SHEN Zhichao, TANG Xuefeng, YUAN Hemei. Comparative Analysis of Organ Index of Wuliangshan Silky Fowl[J]. Journal of Qujing Normal University, 2023, 42(6): 26-31.

参考文献

[1]翁茁先,黄佳琼,张仕豪,等.利用线粒体COI基因揭示中国乌骨鸡遗传多样性和群体遗传结构[J].生物多样性,2019,27(6):667-676.
[2]OU Z M, SHI Y Y, LI Q Q, et al. Effects of Sex on the Muscle Development and Meat Composition in Wuliangshan Black-Bone Chickens[J]. Animals, 2022,12(19):2565.
[3]DOU T F, YAN S X, LIU L X, et al. Integrative Analysis of Transcriptomics and Metabolomics to Reveal the Melanogenesis Pathway of Muscle and Related Meat Characters in Wuliangshan Black-boned Chickens[J]. BMC Genomics, 2022,23(1):173.
[4]施艳燕,宋重境,李青青,等.无量山乌骨鸡胚胎期肝脏组织发育特征分析[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2023(9):121-126+135-136.
[5]LI J, ZHAO Z, XIANG D, et al. Expression of APOB, ADFP and FATP1 and Their Correlation with Fat Deposition in Yunnan’s Top Six Famous Chicken Breeds[J]. British poultry science, 2018, 59(5):494-505.
[6]CUI L, ZHANG X L, CHENG R R, et al. Sex Differences in Growth Performance are Related to Cecal Microbiota in Chicken[J]. Microbial pathogenesis, 2021,150:104710.
[7]张悻,谢志恒,顾万军,等.植物提取物和植物精油对麻黄肉鸡生长性能、抗氧化指标和免疫器官指数的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2023(11):106-109.
[8]National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry[S]. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 1994.
[9]中华人民共和国农业部.鸡饲养标准:NY/T33-2004[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.
[10]MAEVE H, MARY M, VIRGINIA C R, et al. Meat Consumption:Trends and Quality Matters[J]. Meat science, 2014,98(3):561-568.
[11]WU G Y, FANZO J, DENNIS D M, et al. Production and Supply of Highquality Food Protein for Human Consumption: Sustainability, Challenges, and Innovations[J]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2014,1321:1-19.
[12]RUBEN S S, JOAN S. Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption: a Systematic Review[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019,16(7):1220.
[13]ARBAB S, HAFSA Z, MUHAMMAD Y, et al. Effect of Sodium Butyrate on Performance, Immune Status, Microarchitecture of Small Intestinal Mucosa and Lymphoid Organs in Broiler Chickens[J]. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 2017,30(5):690-699.
[14]SHAIMAA S, NAZEMA S A, MANAL K A, et al. Early Nutrition With Different Diets Composition Versus Fasting on Immunity-Related Gene Expression and Histomorphology of Digestive and Lymphoid Organs of Layer-Type Chicks[J]. Animals, 2021,11(6):1568.
[15]HU Q B, YIN F G, YANG L, et al. Dietary Tributyrin Intervention Improves the Carcass Traits, Organ Indices, and Blood Biomarker Profiles in Broilers under the Isocaloric Diets Administration[J]. Poultry Science, 2022,101(10):102061.
[16]LAN R X, LI S Q, ZHAO Z H, et al. Sodium Butyrate as an Effective Feed Additive to Improve Growth Performance and Gastrointestinal Development in Broilers[J]. Veterinary medicine and science, 2020,6(3):491-499.
[17]LI X X, WU X H, MA W F, et al. Effects of Dietary Xylooligosaccharides Supplementation on the Intestinal Morphology, Nitrogen Metabolism, Faecal Ammonia Release, Antioxidant Capacity, and Immune Organ Indices of Broilers[J]. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2022, 21(1):1352-1361.
[18]GIOVANNI T, ANTONELLA S, CARMINE F. Liver-spleen Axis: Intersection between Immunity, Infections and Metabolism[J]. World journal of gastroenterology, 2013, 19(23):3534-3542.
[19]DOMENICO R,ROBERTO T, DANIEL E A K. The Morphological Basis of the Development of the Chick Embryo Immune System[J]. Experimental cell research, 2019,381(2):323-329.
[20]XUE Z Y,ABDUR R A,ZHAO X,et al.RNA-seq-based Gene Expression Pattern and Morphological Alterations in Chick Thymus during Postnatal Development[J].International journal of genomics,2019:6905194.
[21]李奎,褚雪吟,康相涛,等.固始鸡免疫器官指数的发育规律研究[J].动物医学进展,2009,30(11):54-57.
[22]李炳霞,张相伦,杨在宾,等.饲粮蛋白水平对鲁西斗鸡产肉性能及内脏器官发育影响的研究[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2014,45(1):10-16.
[23]荣华,刘丽仙,豆腾飞,等.武定鸡和大围山微型鸡器官指数比较及其与屠体性状的相关性分析[J].中国家禽,2014,36(22):12-15.
[24]荣华,陈晓波,熊保良,等.云南屏边大围山微型鸡种质特性研究[J].云南农业大学学报,2011,26(1):48-53.

无量山乌骨鸡器官指数比较分析

Comparative Analysis of Organ Index of Wuliangshan Silky Fowl

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价