认知叙事学的前景与局限:以心灵呈现为例

曲靖师范学院学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 35-40.

认知叙事学的前景与局限:以心灵呈现为例

沃尔夫·施密德¹, 陈芳/译²

1.汉堡大学跨学科叙事学研究中心,德国汉堡;
2.云南大学文学院,云南昆明 650500

收稿日期:2017-01-28 出版日期:2017-03-26
作者简介:沃尔夫·施密德,德国汉堡大学跨学科叙事学研究中心教授,主要从事叙事学、俄罗斯文学研究。译者简介:陈芳,云南大学文学院讲师,博士,主要从事叙事学、民族文学研究。

Prospects and Limitations of Cognitive Narratology: A Case Study of Mind Representation

Wolf Schmid¹,Chen Fang²

University of Hamburg, Germany;College of Human,ties,yunnan University,Kunming Yunnan,650500,China

Received:2017-01-28 Published:2017-03-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 叙事学认知理论的两个重要概念心灵阅读和思维理论体现了认知叙事学“假设”和“猜想”的特征。认知叙事学将其用于分析叙事和意识关系时,有独到之处。但同时,认知叙事学从其发展初期就表现出两个方面的不足:第一,倾向于将虚构的思想与实际的想法等同起来;第二,在文本分析中,侧重于关注人物,并认为事件从属于人物。认知叙事学所谓的“小说阅读就是心理阅读”应该准确表达为“小说阅读就是心理事件阅读”。

关键词: 认知叙事学, 心灵呈现, 心灵阅读, 思维理论

Abstract: The key concepts of narratological cognitivism, mind reading and theory of mind, carry the characteristics of “hypothesis” and “supposition”. They are effective in the analysis of the relationship between narration and consciousness. However, from the very beginning of its development, cognitive narratology reveals two limitations, one is the tendency to equate fictional minds with real minds and the other is the focus on character with the events subordinating to the character in text analysis. Therefore, it is suggested that “Novel reading is mind reading” should be accurately presented as “Novel reading is mental event reading”.

Key words: cognitive narratology, mind representation, mind reading, theory of mind.

中图分类号:

沃尔夫·施密德, 陈芳/译. 认知叙事学的前景与局限:以心灵呈现为例[J]. 曲靖师范学院学报, 2017, 36(2): 35-40.

Wolf Schmid,Chen Fang. Prospects and Limitations of Cognitive Narratology: A Case Study of Mind Representation[J]. JOURNAL OF QUJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY, 2017, 36(2): 35-40.

参考文献

[1] [6] [8] [40]Palmer A. Fictional Minds[M]. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2004: 141-169.
[2] Palmer A. The Construction of Fictional Minds[J]. Narrative. 2002(10): 29-46.
[3] [4] Herman D. Cognitive Narratology[M]. Handbook of Narratology, P. Hühn J C M J, Berlin/Boston,2014.
[5] Palmer A. Universal minds[J]. Semiotica. 2007, 165: 205-225.
[7] Palmer A. Social Minds in the Novel[M]. Columbus,OH, 2010.
[9] Zunshine L. Why We Read Fiction. Theory of Mind and the Novel[M]. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2006.
[10] Forster E M. Aspects of the Novel[M]. London,1927.61.
[11] Hamburger K. Die Logik der Dichtung[M]. Stuttgart: J.G. Cotta'sche Buchhandlung Nachf. GmbH, 1957.
[12] Hamburger K. The Logic of Literature[Z]. 2nd rev. ed ed. Bloomington M J R. 1973.
[13] [14] Stanzel F K. Der Durchbruch. Die Kontroverse mit K te Hamburger[M]. Unterwegs. Erz hltheorie für Leser, Gttingen,2002: 41-44.
[15] Stanzel F K. Theorie des Erz hlens[M]. G ttingen,1979.
[16] Stanzel F K. Episches Pr teritum, erlebte Rede, historisches Pr sens[J]. Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte. 1959(33): 1-12.
[17] Cohn D. Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction, Princeton[M]. 1978: 7.
[18] [19] [32] Tolstoy L. War and Peace[Z]. Garnett C. New York,1936.
[20] Herman D. Introduction[M]. The Emergence of Mind. Representations of Consciousness in Narrative Discourse in English, Herman D, Lincoln,2011:1-40.
[21] Herman D. The Emergence of Mind. Representations of Consciousness in Narrative Discourse in English[G]. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2011.
[22] Genette G. Fiction and Diction[Z]. Porter C. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993:65.
[23] [24] [26] [27] Palmer A. Social Minds in Fiction and Criticism[J]. Style. 2011(45):196-240.
[25] Bortolussi M. “Response to Alan Palmer's “Social Minds”[J]. Style. 2011(45): 283-287.
[28] Kafalenos E. The Epistemology of Fiction: Knowing v. “Knowing” [J]. Style. 2011(45): 254-258.
[30] Hogan P C. Cognitive Science, Literature, and the Arts: A Guide for Humanists[M]. London,2003.
[31] [33] Hogan P C. Palmer's Anti-Cognitivist Challenge[J]. Style. 2011(45): 244-248.
[34] Herman D. Post-Cartesian Approaches to Narrative and Mind: A Response to Alan Palmer's Target Essay on “Social Minds” [J]. Style. 2011(45): 265-271.
[35] Hutto D D. Understanding Fictional Minds without Theory of Mind![J]. Style. 2011(45): 276-282.
[36] Jahn M. Mind = Mind + Social Mind?: A Response to Alan Palmer's Target Essay[J]. Style. 2011(45):249-253.
[37] Rimmon-Kenan S. Response to Alan Palmer[J]. Style. 2011(45):339-343.
[38] Ryan M. Kinds of Minds: On Alan Palmer's “Social Minds”[J]. Style. 2011(45):654-659.
[39] Fernyhough C. Even “Internalist Minds” are Social[J]. Style. 2011(45):271-275.
[41] Wertsch J V. Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action[M]. Harvard University Press, 1991.
[42] Tolstoy L. Anna Karenina[Z]. Garnett C. New York,1965.
[43] Aristotle. Poetics[Z]. Fyfe W H. London: William Heinemann Ltd, 1932.