曲靖师范学院学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 23-28.

• 文艺学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

美学大讨论中“实践”概念的意义评析

邢研   

  1. 云南大学 文学院 ,云南 昆明 650091
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-12 出版日期:2017-01-26
  • 作者简介:邢 研,云南大学文学院中文系文艺学专业博士研究生,主要从事美学原理研究。

Appraise on the Sense of “Practice” in theDiscussion on Aesthetics

Xing Yan   

  1. College of Literature, Yunnan University, Kunming Yunnan, 650091, China
  • Received:2016-09-12 Published:2017-01-26

摘要: 实践美学发端于20世纪五六十年代掀起的第一次“美学大讨论”但在这场美学大讨论延续近7年的时间跨度中,“实践”概念本身的意义也处在一种不断变化的历程之中。实质上到60年代以后“实践”概念在朱光潜与李泽厚的理论表述中才逐渐取得了较为核心的地位,展示出了“实践”的“内在精神生成”与“外在物质生产”两个不同的向度。但由于当时思想界一种普遍存在着的“去主体性的反映论”思维范式的影响,使得他们的观点都产生了一定程度的混乱。在“美是不以存于人的客观存在”及“艺术是一种意识形态反映”的理论偏执中,以“实践”为研究核心概念的美学研究并没有能建立起一种新的研究范式。

关键词: 实践, 去主体性反映论, 美学大讨论, 李泽厚, 朱光潜

Abstract: It is generally recognized that Practice Aesthetics originated from the first “Aesthetics Discussion” popular in 1950’s and 1960’s. However, in the following seven years of discussion, the sense of “practice” experienced a process of changing. Essentially, it was not until 1960’s the concept of practice began to gain a core position in the theory of Zhu Guangqian and Li Zehou, which shows two different dimensions of practice, “the formation of inner spirit” and “the production of external materials ”. Their views had a certain degree of failure and confusion because of a common thinking paradigm of the thought circle that time, “Reflection Theory of De-subjectivity. With most people clinging to “Beauty is an objective existence independent from human beings” or “Art is a reflection of ideology”, the new practice-centered aesthetic research pattern has not been set up.

Key words: practice, Reflection Theory of De-subjectivity, discussion on aesthetics, Li Zehou, Zhu Guangqian

中图分类号: