刑事诉讼中被害人陈述的证据学思考

曲靖师范学院学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 78-82.

刑事诉讼中被害人陈述的证据学思考

牛瑛

曲靖市人民检察院,云南曲靖 655000

收稿日期:2016-08-24 出版日期:2016-09-26
作者简介:牛瑛,曲靖市人民检察院检察官,主要从事检察研究。

Reflection on the Aggrieved Party’s Statement from the Perspective of Testimony in Criminal Proceedings

Niu Ying

Qujing People’s Procuratorate, Qujing Yunnan 655000, P. R. China

Received:2016-08-24 Published:2016-09-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在我国,刑事诉讼被害人陈述被单列为一类证据与证人证言相互独立。但在司法实践中,被害人的二元性主体特征,被害人陈述的单向性、控诉性等特征在被害人出庭、举证、质证及被害人虚假陈述的责任认定方面带来了一系列问题。在国家补偿制度缺失、社会援助制度不健全的背景下,将被害人纳入当事人范畴并没有起到提高被害人诉讼地位,保障其诉讼权利的立法初衷。因此,将被害人陈述还原其证人证言的本来面目,加大被害人综合保障制度建设,才不失为治本的根本办法。

关键词: 刑事诉讼, 被害人陈述 , 证据 , 权利保障

Abstract: The aggrieved party’s statement and the witness’s statement are independent of each other as evidences in the criminal proceedings, but in the judiciary practice, the aggrieved party’s duality, unidirectionality of the statement, appearance in court, provision of the evidence, question of the evidence and the burden of the aggrieved party’s false evidence cause many problems. The status of the aggrieved party in the criminal proceedings is not improved and his rights are not protected by categorizing the aggrieved party into the client under the background of lack of state compensation rules and inadequate social aiding system. Therefore, the essential method for the problems is to put the aggrieved party’s statement as the witness’s evidence and develop comprehensive protecting system for the aggrieved party.

Key words: criminal proceedings, aggrieved party’s statement, evidence, rights protection

中图分类号:

D915.3

牛瑛. 刑事诉讼中被害人陈述的证据学思考[J]. 曲靖师范学院学报, 2016, 35(5): 78-82.

Niu Ying. Reflection on the Aggrieved Party’s Statement from the Perspective of Testimony in Criminal Proceedings[J]. JOURNAL OF QUJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY, 2016, 35(5): 78-82.