曲靖师范学院学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 106-113.

• 教育教学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

以美育德:大学德育的美学审视

李保玉1, 张天泽2   

  1. 1.曲靖师范学院 教师教育学院,云南 曲靖 655011;
    2.昆明理工大学 马克思主义学院,云南 昆明 650500
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-05 发布日期:2025-09-11
  • 作者简介:李保玉,曲靖师范学院教师教育学院副教授,博士,主要从事思想政治教育研究。
  • 基金资助:
    2023年度国家社会科学基金教育学一般项目“‘强师计划’下地方师范院校主体功能的回归及推进机制研究”(BIA230223);云南省哲学社会科学规划教育学一般项目“云南边疆民族地区师范生教育家精神培育的在地化路径研究”(AC25006)。

Cultivating Morality through Aesthetic Education: An Aesthetic Examination of Moral Education in Universities

LI Baoyu1, ZHANG Tianze2   

  1. 1. School of Teacher Education, Qujing Normal University, Qujing Yunnan 655011;
    2. School of Marxism, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming Yunnan 65050, China
  • Received:2025-05-05 Online:2025-09-11

摘要: 在工具理性主导的现代教育场域中,大学德育面临价值理性危机的深层拷问:功利化目标消解德育本体价值,知性化内容割裂生活世界,智育化方法异化主体间性。这一危机的核心症结在于,德育过程中“美”的缺席,导致道德教育沦为知识规训的技术装置,原本肩负的精神启蒙、心灵滋养功能也随之不断弱化。审美活动通过重构道德认知的美学基础、调和实践矛盾的审美张力、创新价值传递的感性范式,为破解德育困境提供了新的路径选择。为此,大学德育亟待构建“美善相谐”的实践生态——教师需以立美创造超越工具理性桎梏,在生命关怀中唤醒道德自觉;学生应通过审美关照回归生活世界,在具身实践中实现知行合一;师生共同构建双向对话的求美共同体,在精神共鸣中达成价值共识。

关键词: 道德, 美, 美善相谐, 大学德育

Abstract: In the modern educational realm dominated by instrumental rationality, university moral education is faced a profound interrogation of its value rationality crisis: utilitarian goals dissolve the ontological value of moral education, intellectualized content fragments the lifeworld, and intellectually oriented methods alienate intersubjectivity. The core crisis lies in the absence of “aesthetics” in moral education processes, reducing moral instruction to a technical apparatus of knowledge discipline, while its inherent functions of spiritual enlightenment and spiritual nourishment continue to weaken. Aesthetic activities offer new pathways to resolve these dilemmas by reconstructing the aesthetic foundation of moral cognition, mediating aesthetic tensions in practical contradictions, and innovating affective paradigms for value transmission. To address this, universities must construct a “harmony between beauty and goodness” practical ecology: educators should transcend instrumental rationality constraints through aesthetic creation, awakening moral consciousness through life-oriented care; students should return to the lifeworld via aesthetic engagement, realizing the unity of knowledge and action in embodied practice; and teachers and students should co-build a bidirectional dialogue-based aesthetic community, achieving value consensus through spiritual resonance.

Key words: morality, aesthetics, harmony between beauty and goodness, university moral education

中图分类号: