基于灰色系统理论的生态环境—城镇化—旅游业的非协调性耦合识别及优化研究——以重庆市为例

曲靖师范学院学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 91-101.

基于灰色系统理论的生态环境—城镇化—旅游业的非协调性耦合识别及优化研究——以重庆市为例

杨光明, 杨芸瑞, 桂青青

重庆理工大学管理学院,重庆400054

收稿日期:2022-04-22 出版日期:2022-11-26 发布日期:2022-12-14
通讯作者: 杨芸瑞,重庆理工大学管理学院硕士研究生,主要从事效率优化与可持续发展研究.
作者简介:杨光明,重庆理工大学管理学院副教授,博士,硕士生导师,主要从事战略管理和流域生态安全研究.
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重点项目“长江经济带生态保护和高质量发展的非协调性耦合识别与协同机制创新研究”(20AJY005);重庆市教委科学技术项目“成渝双城经济圈城镇化—生态化—科技化—旅游业非协调耦合识别与路径优化研究”(KJQN202101122);重庆理工大学研究生创新项目“成渝双城经济圈能源消耗、生态承载与经济发展复合系统协调发展路径研究”(clgycx20203044).

Identification and Optimization of Uncoordinated Coupling of Ecology-Urbanization-Tourism Based on Gray System Theory: A Case Study of Chongqing

YANG Guangming, YANG Yunrui, GUI Qingqing

College of Management, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China

Received:2022-04-22 Published:2022-11-26 Online:2022-12-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的]生态环境、城镇化与旅游业各系统发展对社会经济协调持续发展至关重要,理清三大系统之间的关系与现状对重庆市未来发展具有重要意义.[方法]以重庆市为研究对象,基于灰色系统理论,从非协调性耦合角度对重庆市生态环境、城镇化及旅游业系统展开研究.通过构建灰色关联模型和非协调耦合模型探究重庆市生态环境、城镇化与旅游业的协调发展状况.[结果]①生态环境、城镇化与旅游业系统内部各指标关联度均在0.5以上,即各指标对生态环境、城镇化及旅游业发展有较强影响.系统间关联度均在0.65以上,处于高或极高关联水平,即各系统之间联系紧密,相互影响.②2000—2019年期间,生态环境、城镇化与旅游业发展水平整体上均呈现上升态势,但生态环境受旅游业及城镇化影响,呈现较大波动.③生态环境、城镇化与旅游业非协调耦合度从2000年的0.7304降至2019年的0.0751,非协调耦合程度在逐渐减弱,系统之间协调发展水平越来越好.[结论]重庆市生态环境、城镇化与旅游业三大系统之间关系紧密,且非协调水平较低.未来城镇化建设和旅游业发展过程中,应更加注重生态环境修复,达到各系统之间协调可持续发展.

关键词: 灰色系统理论, 旅游业, 城镇化, 生态环境, 非协调性耦合

Abstract: [Objective] The development of each system of ecological environment, urbanization and tourism is crucial to the coordinated and sustainable socioeconomic development, and it is important to clarify the relationship and current situation among the three systems for the future development of Chongqing city. [Methods] Based on the gray system theory, the ecological environment, urbanization and tourism systems in Chongqing were studied from the perspective of non-coordinated coupling. The coordinated development of ecological environment, urbanization and tourism in Chongqing was explored by constructing gray correlation model and non-coordinated coupling model. [Results] ① The correlation degree of each indicator within the system of ecological environment, urbanization and tourism is above 0.5, with each indicator having a strong influence on the development of ecological environment, urbanization and tourism. The inter-system correlations are all above 0.65, which are at high or very high correlation levels, with the systems being closely linked and influence each other. ② The ecological environment, urbanization and tourism development levels all show an overall increase during 2000-2019, but the ecological environment is influenced by tourism and urbanization, showing large fluctuations. ③ The non-coordinated coupling degree of ecological environment, urbanization and tourism decreased from 0.7304 in 2000 to 0.0751 in 2019, and the non-coordinated coupling degree is gradually weakening, and the level of coordinated development among systems is getting better. [Conclusion] The relationship between the three systems of ecological environment, urbanization and tourism in Chongqing is close and the level of non-coordination is low. In the process of future urbanization and tourism development, more attention should be paid to ecological environment restoration to achieve coordinated and sustainable development among the systems.

Key words: grey system theory, tourism, urbanization, ecology, non-coordinated coupling

中图分类号:

F426

杨光明, 杨芸瑞, 桂青青. 基于灰色系统理论的生态环境—城镇化—旅游业的非协调性耦合识别及优化研究——以重庆市为例[J]. 曲靖师范学院学报, 2022, 41(6): 91-101.

YANG Guangming, YANG Yunrui, GUI Qingqing. Identification and Optimization of Uncoordinated Coupling of Ecology-Urbanization-Tourism Based on Gray System Theory: A Case Study of Chongqing[J]. Journal of Qujing Normal University, 2022, 41(6): 91-101.

参考文献

[1]RAZA S A, QURESHI M A, AHMED M, et al. Non-linear relationship between tourism, economic growth, urbanization, and environmental degradation: evidence from smooth transition models[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2021, 28(2): 14261442.
[2]NATHANIEL S, ANYANWU O, SHAH M. Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020, 27(1):14601-14613.
[3]SGHAIER A, GUIZANI A, BEN JABEUR S, et al. Tourism development, energy consumption and environmental quality in Tunisia, Egypt and Morocco: a trivariate analysis[J]. GeoJournal, 2019, 84: 593-609.
[4]FU S, ZHUO H, SONG H, et al. Examination of a coupling coordination relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment: a case study in Qingdao, China[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2020, 27: 23981-23993.
[5]SHEN Y F. Measurement of tourism industry-ecological environment coupling degree and management and control measures for tourism environment: a case study of henan province, china[J]. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 2020, 19(2): 857-864.
[6]DING A. The coupling effect measure and countermeasures between tourism industry and new urbanization in Guanzhong area[J].Agro Food Industry Hi-Tech, 2017, 28(3): 1286-1290.
[7]ZHANG T, LI L. Research on temporal and spatial variations in the degree of coupling coordination of tourism–urbanization–ecological environment: a case study of Heilongjiang, China[J].Environ Dev Sustain, 2021, 23:8474-8491.
[8]赵安周,王冬利,王金杰,等.京津冀城市群城镇化—旅游业—生态环境耦合协调度及障碍因子诊断[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(4):333-341.
[9]胡振鹏,黄晓杏,傅春,等.环鄱阳湖地区旅游产业—城镇化—生态环境交互耦合的定量比较及演化分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(12):2012-2020.
[10]高杨,马耀峰,刘军胜.旅游业—城镇化—生态环境耦合协调及发展类型研究——以京津冀地区为例[J].陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2016,44(5):109-118.
[11]杨光明,罗垚,陈也,等.川渝地区农业与旅游业耦合协调机理及优化研究——基于灰色系统理论[J].资源开发与市场,2021,37(8):991-997.
[12]苏胜亮.宁夏回族自治区生态环境与经济发展耦合协调研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):367-374.
[13]张珺,张妍.基于灰色系统理论的生态农业与生态旅游业耦合协调度测算分析——以湖南省为例[J].生态经济,2020,36(2):122-126+144.
[14]杨光明,桂青青,陈也,等. 基于灰色关联理论的三峡库区2015—2019年生态安全时空演变特征研究[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(5):348-356.
[15]杨庆,张凤太,孙长城,等.非协调耦合视角下长江经济带高质量发展与生态保护的时空特征[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(3):238-246+257.
[16]孙平军.1994—2011年江苏省城市化与生态环境非协调性耦合关系的判别[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(8):1051-1056.